• Cost Comparison
  • Salary Benchmark

That offshore discount isn't one flat number for every hire

The offshore saving shrinks exactly where the skill is already scarce.

A Filipino man leaning slightly forward in a long narrow home office in Manila.
3 min readPublished Oct 17, 2026
DA
Davin Acuram

The seat a firm most needs to fill offshore is the one the discount covers least. ConnectOS says the saving on an offshore hire is not one number. Outsource Accelerator reported that the Melbourne outsourcing firm's expected revenue is A$100 million this financial year, about $69 million, up from A$80 million. Founder Steve Evans told the Australian Financial Review that an offshore worker costs about a third of an onshore one, once payroll taxes, superannuation and equipment are counted.

Then came the qualifier. Higher-demand technology roles sit at around half that saving, Evans said, because demand in the Philippines is as high as it is in Australia. The firm employs more than 2,500 outsourcing staff and about 140 support people, serving more than 350 customers. More than 20 of them are accounting firms.

Where the discount thins

A third is a geography number. Half of it is a market number. The first compares what a desk costs in Manila against what one costs in Melbourne. The second compares what a scarce person costs when two countries bid for them. Those are different claims, and the brochure quotes the first one.

Evans put the qualifier on the record himself, which rate cards don't. Offshore pricing is a second labor market rather than a discount applied to the first. It has its own shortages. A shortage lifts a price there exactly the way it does here. Cheap is a fact about who else wants the person.

What the accountants wanted

In May, ConnectOS secured a partnership with the National Tax and Accountants' Association as its official outsourcing provider. The association encompasses more than 10,000 member firms and 45,000 professionals across the sector. Member firms are asking for extra capacity, Evans said. Clients turn to offshoring when they cannot find the skills they need at home quickly.

Most of them use offshore staff to augment teams they already have. Not replace them. The trigger in that report is a vacancy nobody could fill, and the price is what made the answer palatable. The people in that story weren't cutting a role they could already staff.

Which half you are hiring in

US law firms want the scarce half. General assistance is easy to find anywhere. An experienced paralegal is not, and a specialist wanted badly in two countries is priced by both of them. Apply a blended saving to the one seat you cannot fill locally, and the budget comes out wrong.

A Filipino paralegal works late at night at a dedicated desk in her home office in Manila.

Capacity moved the buyers in that report, not cost, and US firms can measure their own version of that question: the Clio Legal Trends Report has tracked how firm operations have changed year over year. So settle which role is actually blocking before you settle a rate. Then find out which half of that saving it sits in. You are only hiring in one of them.

Related Topics