• Cost Comparison
  • Time to Hire

A cost that never reaches an invoice is never cross-examined

Someone finally priced the empty chair. Firms still count only the hire.

An American woman with both hands resting on a desk surface in a mid-sized law firm office in Austin.
3 min readPublished Sep 30, 2026
DA
Davin Acuram

An open seat at your firm is costing money nobody has counted. Outsource Accelerator reported on an op-ed by Sambhav Aggarwal for DevOps.com that finally put a figure on one. Aggarwal argues that outsourced software development fails on process rather than on the model itself. The figure is the part that stayed with me.

Hiring a senior full-stack engineer in the US or UK takes four to six months on average. Then 60 to 90 days more before meaningful work begins. Aggarwal runs that against a startup carrying $200,000 in monthly expenses. More than $400,000, gone before the engineer ships a production feature. No purchase order, no vendor, no line item. Nobody signs off on that spend because nobody records it.

What the empty chair costs

Startup arithmetic does not transfer to a firm cleanly, and I do not think it needs to. A partner absorbing a paralegal's work is still billing, the revenue lands, and nothing looks broken. Leave the seat open, split the work across two desks that are already full, and payroll will look better. An open seat reads as a saving on the payroll line, and nobody ever made it a number. The loss surfaces later, as slower matters and later collections. A cost that never reaches an invoice is never cross-examined.

A Filipino lawyer or paralegal seated at a desk in a law office.

A firm buys that delay whether or not it writes it down anywhere.

The split is not a choice here

The hybrid shape Aggarwal describes keeps product, architecture and quality in-house and sends feature work and surge capacity outside. Engineering leaders pick that line. A law firm does not, because what supervision a lawyer owes over outside work has been addressed in formal opinions. The final read stays with the licensed attorney, whatever a vendor's scope document happens to say. So Aggarwal's $400,000 prices a direct hire, which is the inside half of the split. A vendor can absorb the outside half while the seat sits empty, and nothing at all absorbs the inside one.

The chair you cannot outsource is the one nobody has priced.

A number with no source

Aggarwal also claims that outsourced teams using AI-assisted pipelines ship 30% to 40% faster than outsourced teams without them. Outsource Accelerator noted that no source was given for it. Appearing a few paragraphs from a priced vacancy, the claim is a strange thing to leave bare. One number survives a challenge from a managing partner. The other one is a mood.

I would put the vacancy number in front of a partner. The 40% I would leave on the page.

Related Topics