- Cost Comparison
- Mid Size Firms
Offshore staff management is the job the retainer removes
The retainer's real product was never the work. It was the managing.
One firm told us it pays up to $12,000 a month for SEO, website management and Google Business Profile management. Against the cost of hiring that same capability locally in the US, the number is defensible. Against an offshore hire it is not. A mid-level SEO specialist in the Philippines sits between $1,300 and $1,500 a month. So the retainer is not really priced on the work. It is priced on not having to manage anybody.
Why most US law firms never employ a marketing specialist
Most US law firms outsource marketing to a third-party agency and do not employ an in-house digital marketing specialist. That is the common setup, not the exception. I do not know why. Standing up the function in-house means learning how to structure it, and then learning how to manage it, and an agency sells a finished answer instead. One of those is a purchase. The other is a job.
Nobody signs a retainer thinking of it that way. A managing partner thinks he is buying rankings, or a site that stays up, or a Google Business Profile somebody else worries about. He is also buying the absence of a management problem, and that part never appears on the scope of work.
What $12,000 a month looks like next to an offshore hire
Twelve thousand dollars a month for SEO, website management and Google Business Profile management holds up fine against a US salary. Price the same capability in the Philippines and it stops holding up. A mid-level SEO specialist sits between $1,300 and $1,500 a month. An expert-level specialist sits between $1,500 and $2,000.
The retainer is defensible and indefensible at the same time, depending on what it is set beside. That is not a trick of arithmetic. It is what happens when a firm never chose the comparison deliberately in the first place, because the only alternative it ever priced was a local hire.
The comparison a firm chooses decides the answer before the math starts.
The attention an agency structurally cannot sell
An agency divides its attention across a roster of clients and delivers a packaged scope. That is the product, and it is an honest one. Scope is what makes the work repeatable and the price predictable, and a firm that wants predictable output is buying the right thing. But a packaged scope is a ceiling as well as a floor.
A full-time hire works one firm's goal every day. Different attention. Different result. And the Filipino working habits compound it: firms end up with a dedicated SEO worker who frequently works past the hours agreed.
Nobody invoices for that.
What offshore staff management actually asks of a firm
Offshore staff management is the trade a firm makes when it stops paying a retainer. The cost an agency removes is the work of structuring and managing a marketing function, and hiring in-house hands that work straight back. Someone has to set the goal. Someone has to read the output. Someone has to hold a check-in on a schedule rather than when a report lands.
None of that is heavy. It is just not free, and it lands on people who already report that administrative burden eats into the working day. A firm that will not do it is better off with the retainer, whatever the rate gap says. A firm that will do it is buying a specialist for a tenth of the number and keeping the difference.
The $12,000 was never a marketing budget. It was a management fee with a marketing scope stapled to it.
People also ask about this
Does an offshore SEO specialist replace an agency outright?
Why is the same retainer defensible against a US hire and not an offshore one?
Is a dedicated hire actually better than an agency, or just cheaper?
Related Topics
Recommended Readings
Build Your Offshore Team Risk-Free
No upfront cost. Fill roles in 14 days. Pre-vetted, not just pre-screened.